Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Conduct Baseline Habitat and Pop. Dynamics Studies on Lampreys in Cedar Cr. |
| Proposal ID | 9104 |
| Organization | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Office (USFWS, CRFPO) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Travis C. Coley |
| Mailing address | 9317 Hwy. 99, Suite I Vancouver, WA 98665 |
| Phone / email | 3606967605 / Travis_Coley@mail.fws.gov |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Lewis |
| Short description | With emphasis on Pacific lampreys, identify and quantitatively evaluate populations of Lampetra and their habitats in a stream below Bonneville. |
| Target species | Pacific lamprey |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$89,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$19,000 |
| Supplies |
|
$3,000 |
| Operating |
|
$10,000 |
| Tag |
|
$145 |
| Travel |
|
$3,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$26,000 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$82,000 |
| $232,145 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $232,145 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $232,145 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Drop mark/recapture (obj. 3a & 4) and keep spawning characteristics and capping redds
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The ISRP review team ranks this proposal high among Lower Columbia studies. The proposal is a refreshing change from business-as-usual and offers a strong commitment to submit study results for peer review and publication. The project features a balanced, well-coordinated team of investigators with great emphasis on monitoring and evaluation. ISRP reviewers praise the proposal's description of baseline data and habitat use, and commend its statements of objectives, hypotheses and tests. They also endorse the selection of a study site below Bonneville Dam. The sole criticism of the proposal is its lack of direct ties to other projects and its mild explanation of programmatic need and relationships.