FY 1999 proposal 9106
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
9106 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Aquisition of Malheur Wildlife Mitigation Site |
Proposal ID | 9106 |
Organization | Burns Paiute Tribe (BPT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Haace St. Martin/Daniel Gonzalez |
Mailing address | HC 71 - 100 Pasigo St Burns, OR 97720 |
Phone / email | 5415731533 / Burns@orednet.org/gonfish@orednet.org |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Upper Snake / Malheur |
Short description | The project would protect and enhance critical fish and wildife habitat. The project consist of riparian/riverine that can be restored to its natural state. In many places there are large areas of shrub steppe that could provide significant HU's.. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9705900 | Securing Wildlife Mitgation -Oregon | Planning & coordination |
9701900 | Stinkingwater Salmonid Project | Fisheries project sponsored by BPT in the same watershed |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | Wildlife Biologist 1040hrs @ $15.90, Program Manager 2080 hrs @ $13. 90 | $45,448 |
Fringe | 25% | $11,362 |
Supplies | Purchase existing haying equipment and implements, 1 flatbed 1 ton truck | $200,000 |
Operating | 6700 acres @ 15.00/acre | $100,500 |
Capital | $2,000,000 | |
Travel | 120 miles round trip X 4days/week X 20 weeks @ .$31/mile | $3,000 |
Indirect | 29% | $46,000 |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
$2,406,310 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $2,406,310 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $2,406,310 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Delays due to extensive landowner negotiatons and slow response time from the regulatory agencies regarding insuance of permits for proposed in-stream work.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Fund under 9705900. Project request is revised to $1,756,310 due to reduction in acquisition costs of $650,000.Comment:
This proposal for land acquisition to mitigate wildlife losses aptly describes the land to be acquired and justifies the acquisition. The hay production portion of the proposal should be viewed cautiously, as it may involve conflicting goals. For instance, is water from the stream to be used to irrigate hay? The restoration and management activities may be more intensive and active than is required. The ranch to be acquired is tied to BLM land and State lands; thus, management should be coordinated.