FY 1999 proposal 9130
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
9130 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Burns Paiute Mitigation Coordinator |
Proposal ID | 9130 |
Organization | Burns Paiute Tribe (BPT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Haace St. Martin |
Mailing address | HC 71 - 100 Pasigo St Burns, OR 97720 |
Phone / email | 5415731533 / Burns@ordnet.org |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Upper Snake / Malheur |
Short description | Develop wildlife mitigation stategies consisting of selection, scientific analysis, implementation (acquisition, enhancement, etc.), O&M, and evalution of wildlife Mitigation projects for the Burns Paiute Tribe. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9705900 | Planning & coordination | |
9701900 | Stinkingwater Salmonid Project | Fisheries project sponsored by BPT in the same watershed |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | 22,050 | $23,153 |
Fringe | 5,513 | $5,789 |
Supplies | 3715 | $3,715 |
Travel | 3,624 | $3,624 |
Indirect | 9,000 | $9,000 |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
$45,281 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $45,281 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $45,281 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Delays due to extensive landowner negotiatonsans slow resonse time from the regulatory agencies regarding issuance of permits for proposed in-stream work.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Fund under 9705900Comment:
This is a well-written proposal. The description of process and methods are adequate, however, the proposal does not sufficiently describe tangible results or the specific projects to be undertaken by a coordinator. The proposal should be combined with those for actual work to be undertaken, so that the scientific soundness and value of the project can be evaluated.