Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit Watershed Restoration Plan Now |
| Proposal ID | 9132 |
| Organization | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Don Sampson |
| Mailing address | 729 NE Oregon St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97232 |
| Phone / email | 5032380667 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Tracking and coordinating tribal/subbasin projects through regional review and funding processes to ensure timely on-the-ground project implementation… |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$46,750 |
| Fringe |
|
$16,065 |
| Supplies |
|
$2,000 |
| Travel |
|
$5,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$28,070 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$15,500 |
| Other |
|
$8,000 |
| $121,385 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $121,385 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $121,385 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: none anticipated
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Proposal is the same as in FY98 – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding.Technical Issue: Clearly identify the measurable objectives for FY99.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a well-written proposal ranked in the upper third of the set. The rationale and proposed work are described well. The work is mostly administrative, but should help coordination and improve proposals. The proposal does not clarify why coordination cannot be done now without additional BPA funds. This raises the generic question of the need for coordination proposals when individual projects have overhead built in that could be considered as funding for coordination.