FY 1999 proposal 9132

Additional documents

TitleType
9132 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleImplement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit Watershed Restoration Plan Now
Proposal ID9132
OrganizationColumbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDon Sampson
Mailing address729 NE Oregon St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97232
Phone / email5032380667 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinSystemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionTracking and coordinating tribal/subbasin projects through regional review and funding processes to ensure timely on-the-ground project implementation…
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $46,750
Fringe $16,065
Supplies $2,000
Travel $5,000
Indirect $28,070
Subcontractor $15,500
Other $8,000
$121,385
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$121,385
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$121,385
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: none anticipated


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Proposal is the same as in FY98 – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding.

Technical Issue: Clearly identify the measurable objectives for FY99.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a well-written proposal ranked in the upper third of the set. The rationale and proposed work are described well. The work is mostly administrative, but should help coordination and improve proposals. The proposal does not clarify why coordination cannot be done now without additional BPA funds. This raises the generic question of the need for coordination proposals when individual projects have overhead built in that could be considered as funding for coordination.