Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Bakeoven Riparian Assessment |
| Proposal ID | 9133 |
| Organization | Wasco County Soil and Water Conservation District |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Ron Graves |
| Mailing address | 2325 River Road, Suite 3 The Dalles, OR 97058 |
| Phone / email | 5412966178 / wascoswcd@netcnct.net |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Deschutes |
| Short description | Assess fish habitat needs based on existing survey data and low level aerial photography. Develop detailed riparian restoration plans and a monitoring plan, commence implementation with 1.5 miles of riparian fence. |
| Target species | Summer Steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$7,800 |
| Fringe |
|
$2,060 |
| Supplies |
|
$2,000 |
| Travel |
|
$132 |
| Indirect |
|
$4,573 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$18,500 |
| $35,065 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $35,065 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $35,065 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: No schedule constraints are currently identified.
Major Milestones: September 1999 Complete riparian assessments, detailed
riparian restoration plans
June 1999 Complete demonstration exclo
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Describe the scientific methods that will be used to conduct the assessment.Technical Issue: Clearly explain how the monitoring protocol is tied to the project (is the monitoring done inside and outside the exclosures to determine effectiveness?).
Technical Issue: Need to clearly explain how the action will achieve the stated objectives (increase from 200 to 600 returning adults).
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The revised proposal includes collaboration with ODFW and is adequate. However, monitoring details are still vague. The demonstration livestock exclosure is a good idea, but the proposal should provide more details on why it is needed and where it will be located. Watershed analysis is an important positive aspect of the project.