Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | John Day Watershed Restoration |
| Proposal ID | 9137 |
| Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWSRO) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Patty O’Toole |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box C Warm Springs, OR 97761 |
| Phone / email | 5415533233 / potoole@warmsprings.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / John Day |
| Short description | Protection and restoration actions to improve water quality and fish habitat, eliminate passage barriers for anadromous (spring chinook salmon, summer steelhead trout, and Pacific lamprey) and resident fish, and reduce summer water temperatures. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Supplies |
|
$134,424 |
| Travel |
|
$2,500 |
| Subcontractor |
Grant Soil and Water Conservation District |
$52,737 |
| Other |
|
$26,095 |
| $215,756 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $215,756 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $215,756 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete: Clearly a watershed proposal. The criteria used are insufficient to fully evaluate watershed proposals. We can only assume that the proposed structural modifications are appropriate.
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a very thorough and especially impressive proposal. However, monitoring should be described in more detail. Technical justification was extensive, but it could use a more explicit fisheries context. The budget indicates a one-year expenditure of funds, but it is not clear if the budget accounts for costs of future operation, maintenance, and monitoring.