FY 1999 proposal 9142

Additional documents

TitleType
9142 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleProduce Watershed Analysis Procedure for Salmon Habitat Restoration
Proposal ID9142
OrganizationColumbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDale McCullough
Mailing address729 NE Oregon St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97232
Phone / email5032380667 / fishsci@hevanet.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinSystemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionCreate a standardized design and methodology for watershed analyses specifically oriented toward salmon restoration project development.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $77,000
Fringe $24,255
Supplies $3,300
Travel $4,200
Indirect $40,131
Subcontractor $0
$148,886
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$148,886
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$148,886
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Explain how this project is not redundant with other established procedures (e.g., Forest Service (ICEBMP), WDFW, GWEB).

Technical Issue: Explain how the costs are not excessive for the expected results.

Technical Issue: More clearly describe how this process will address existing deficiencies in watershed analysis procedures.


Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Pending
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a well-documented and well-written proposal that ranked in the lower midrange of proposals in this set. It is connected to the Fish and Wildlife Program, Return to the River, Upstream, CBFWA, etc. Watershed analysis as a science is in a developmental phase; thus, investing money to analyze the methods is needed. This proposal does not specifically describe the current watershed analysis methods and frameworks, and it should. It is not clear that a separate standard guide for the Fish and Wildlife Program projects is needed, but it may be.