FY 1999 proposal 9146

Additional documents

TitleType
9146 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEvaluate Effects of Habitat Work Conducted in Fifteenmile Creek
Proposal ID9146
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameErik Olsen
Mailing address3430 W 10th St. The Dalles, OR 97058
Phone / email5412968045 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Fifteenmile
Short descriptionEstimate smolt production and adult escapements for the indigenous wild population of winter steelhead in Fifteenmile Creek and collect information on selected life history and biological characteristics of the population.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
93040 Fifteenmile Creek Habitat Restoration Project This project will be evaluated by the proposed project.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $43,955
Fringe $17,582
Supplies $14,210
Travel $2,880
Indirect $18,005
Subcontractor $0
$96,632
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$96,632
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$96,632
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Our ability to implement this project, as proposed and budgeted, will be determined by how effectively we can integrate this project with the Hood River/Pelton ladder project and The Fifteenmile Creek project..


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete: This is primarily a watershed proposal and should be reviewed as such. The criteria used are insufficient to fully evaluate watershed proposals. The study proposes to monitor trends in survival and relate them to habitat improvements. These improvements, however, were initiated in 1986. There is no apparent way to establish a baseline against which improvement is measured. In addition, it is unclear how an upward trend in survival can be related to improvements in habitat in light of the myriad of factors affecting the life cycle.

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete For reasons stated above.

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Incomplete

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Adult monitoring reduced and screw trap not needed
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

The technical justification for this project is poor. If there are data going back to 1960s, they should have been summarized and presented in the proposal. Given the availability of historical data, the power of the proposed tests should have been determined. The proposal needs to take into account ocean productivity, drought, floods and other environmental conditions. The proposal does not show the relationship to other monitoring projects.