Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Prioritize Research and Restoration Needs for Pacific Lamprey |
Proposal ID | 9147 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Dave Ward/Tom Rien |
Mailing address | 17330 SE Evelyn St. Clackamas, OR 97015 |
Phone / email | 5036572000 / davidlward@yahoo.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Conduct several planning group meetings and document the information, research, and immediate restoration actions needed for Pacific lamprey in the Columbia River Basin. Set priorities for future work based on opinions from agency and tribal experts. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$11,117 |
Fringe |
|
$4,558 |
Supplies |
|
$275 |
Operating |
|
$713 |
Travel |
|
$591 |
Indirect |
|
$3,951 |
Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $21,205 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $21,205 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $21,205 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: The project schedule will be constrained by schedules of personnel from agencies who will participate in the work groups. It is important to remain flexible and to allow all interested parties a fair chance to participate.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete: The study proposes to establish a technical work group to identify research needs and priorities. Establishing a group (in addition to one that already exists) may not be the appropriate method of developing a workplan. It has often failed before because of differing policy direction.
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Incomplete
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Pending - need to compare work with other lamprey projects
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The need for this project is unclear given the apparent relationship to Proposal Number 9402600, submitted by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, relating to Pacific lamprey research and restoration. The reviewers would prefer a unified proposal from cooperating individuals.