Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Assess Adult Steelhead Escapement in the Secesh River System |
Proposal ID | 9151 |
Organization | Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Dave Faurot |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 1942 McCall, ID 83638 |
Phone / email | 2086345290 / davef@nezperce.org |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Salmon |
Short description | Abundance of spawning steelhead will be assessed by multiple ground counts and sampling kelts, captured by non-lethal means. Information gathered will enhance managements knowledge of the stocks origin and life history characteristics. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$23,000 |
Fringe |
|
$5,000 |
Supplies |
|
$3,000 |
Operating |
|
$2,000 |
Capital |
|
$6,500 |
Travel |
|
$5,000 |
Indirect |
|
$12,994 |
Subcontractor |
|
$8,000 |
| $65,494 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $65,494 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $65,494 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Unusually harsh winter storms/environmental conditions and challenges with access
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Defer
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a well-written proposal for valuable basic information. The Secesh River is a good area for the study. The proposal states the target product and deadline and describes how data will be analyzed. The proposal could be improved in several areas: The sampling scheme is not adequately described, nor is how data will be used to evaluate the method. The proposal should describe what reaches are to be sampled. Also, adequacy of the project timeline needs to be established (e.g., will the study allow enough time to quantify the abundance and timing of spawning?).