Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Rock Creek Watershed Assessment and Restoration Project |
| Proposal ID | 9159 |
| Organization | Yakama Indian Nation Fisheries Program (YIN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Lynn Hatcher |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / lynn@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Rock Creek |
| Short description | Conduct Watershed Analyis in the Rock Creek drainage to determine conditions of the stream habitat, adjacent riparian stands, limiting factors to fish and wildlife production, and land management effects. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$51,290 |
| Fringe |
|
$12,977 |
| Supplies |
|
$14,320 |
| Operating |
|
$13,850 |
| Travel |
|
$750 |
| Indirect |
|
$24,589 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$148,330 |
| $266,106 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $266,106 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $266,106 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None anticipated. Some parts of the drainage may not receive full assessment or prescriptive measures if landowners are unwilling to participate. Unusual weather conditions may also hinder assessment of watershed conditions.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Explain why $250,000 is necessary to perform the watershed assessment.Technical Issue: Good that the assessment will follow the federal six-step guide and the Washington State WA manual.
Technical Issue: Need to clearly describe what methodology will be used to perform the assessment and analysis, how the analyses will be used for management decisions, and what the expected outcome is.
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Fund at reduced level due to budget constraints
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is well written. It describes the use of both the federal and Washington State watershed analysis, which is a positive feature. Biological monitoring and the current assessment of salmonids need to be better described.