FY 1999 proposal 198201300

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
198201300 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Coded-Wire Tag Recovery Program
Proposal ID	198201300
Organization	Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Pam Kahut
Mailing address	45 SE 82nd Dr., Suite 100 Gladstone, OR 97027-2522
Phone / email	5036505400 / pam.kahut@psmfc.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Systemwide / Systemwide
Short description	Basic data collection and monitoring program for a wide variety of studies releasing CWT marked fish in the Columbia River Basin. Basic estimates of abundance of hatchery and wild anadromous stocks are used to model and set regional harvest strategies.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description
8906500	Annual Fish Marking Program - Missing Production Groups OR/WA/ID (USFWS)	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
8906600	Annual Coded Wire Tag Program - Missing Production WA HTCH (WDFW)	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
8906900	Annual Coded Wire Tag Program - Missing Production OR HTCH (ODFW)	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
9306000	Columbia River Terminal Fisheries Research Project	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
9000500	Umatilla Hatchery - Monitoring/Eval Projects	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
8816000	Willamette Hatchery Oxygen Supplementation	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
8902900	Hood River Production Program - Pelton Ladder - Hatchery	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
8805303	Hood River Production Program - CWTS - M&E	Recovery of CWTs from marked fish released by BPA funded program
9600800	PATH - Participation by State and Tribal Agencies	CWT data from fisheries and escapement used for stock modeling purposes
833500	Big Canyon Creek Portable Acclimation/Release Facility	CWTs used along with PIT tags and radio tags for evaluation studies
9603301	Yakima River Fall Chinook Supplementation	CWTs used for monitoring and evaluation
9603302	Yakima River Coho Restoration	CWTs used for monitoring and evaluation
9506401	Refinement of Marking Methods for YKFP	CWTs included in marking methods
9506300	Yakima/Klickitat Monitoring and Evaluation Program	CWTs used for monitoring and evaluation
	Incomplete Listing

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel	ODFW, WDFW, PSMFC (primarily field sampling personnel)	$880,257
Fringe	ODFW (36%), WDFW (14%-37%), PSMFC (37%)	$298,408
Supplies	Computer ($3,500), software, printer, data logger/parts, cell phones, rain gear, sampling gear	$24,530
Operating	Includes PSMFC computer operations ($67,132)	$110,242
Travel	Vehicles, mileage, per diem, & lodging: ODFW ($42,219); WDFW ($73,060)	$115,279
Indirect	ODFW (22.9%), WDFW (19%); PSMFC (15%)	$268,811
Subcontractor	Washington Department Fish and Wildlife (WDFW); Oregon Department Fish and Wildlife (ODFW); Regional Mark Processing Center (PSMFC)	$15,000
Other		$18,913
Other		$18,913
Other		$18,913
		$1,769,266

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$1,769,266
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$1,769,266
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Sampling programs are dependent upon the timing of the various fisheries. As such, any management adjustments in the fisheries (i.e. early closures or extended seasons) may neccessitate changes to sampling schedules.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Nonwatershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Adequate

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is an adequate proposal that ranked high in the set. It is a needed regionwide program that provides extensive support for wide-ranging activities. The percentage of funding by BPA is not given, but probably should not be all of it. With its long history and several proposals (not well coordinated) the coded-wire tag program is suggested for independent technical evaluation in the near future (without a moratorium on funding).