FY 1999 proposal 198402100

Additional documents

TitleType
198402100 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleProtect and Enhance John Day River Fish Habitat
Proposal ID198402100
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJeff Neal
Mailing addressP.O. Box 515 John Day, OR
Phone / email5415750561 / jdscreen@orednet.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / John Day
Short descriptionEstablish long term riparian, fish habitat and tributary passage improvement on private lands.
Target speciesSpring Chinook Salmon, Summer Steelhead, Bull Trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9605300 North Fork John Day Dredge Tailings Restoration Project Share equipment and personnel between public and private lands.
8400800 North Fork John Day Habitat Improvement Allows continuity between landownerships on John Day streams.
8402500 Grande Ronde Habitat Enhancement Share equipment and personnel.
8710002 Umatilla Habitat Improvement Share equipment and personnel.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel 2 FTE’s 1 temp. 60% is for O&M $85,000
Fringe at 38%. 60% is for O&M $32,300
Supplies Fence materials, instream materials, field supplies $62,063
Operating add 60% of Personnel, Fringe benefits, Travel and Indirect. $17,500
Capital Pickup tool box , rock drill, solar water pumps. $0
Travel for 3 people, 60% is for O&M $16,000
Indirect 22.9%; except Capital and Subcontracts. 60% is for O&M $54,157
Subcontractor Grant Soil and Water Conservation District; Various local contractors for fence materials and construction. $112,980
$380,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$380,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$380,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Catastrophic natural events like floods, windstorms or extreme fire danger.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision*
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Need to provide clear rationale for the cost in relation to O&M – the concern is that the cost is excessive for meeting the objectives of operations and maintenance only.

Management Issue: Classic example of high cost structural projects that require excessive money to maintain in the future.

Technical Issue: Clearly identify the direct benefits to fish and wildlife, and whether those benefits are being achieved.

Part of the project should be committed to monitoring the maintenance and operations activities. Need to describe a monitoring program to determine if the original proposal objectives are still being met; and to evaluate the benefits and results from the O&M.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This project has been funded for several years so it needs to present more information on accomplishments and the results of monitoring.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$447,889 $447,889 $447,889

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website