FY 1999 proposal 198740100
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198740100 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Assess Smolt Condition for Travel Time Analysis: Physiology,Health Survival |
Proposal ID | 198740100 |
Organization | U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Columbia River Research Laboratory (USGS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Robin M. Schrock and Alec G. Maule |
Mailing address | Col. R Research Lab, USGS, Biological Resources Div. 5501A Cook-Underwood Cook, WA 98605 |
Phone / email | 5095382299 / Robin_Schrock@usgs.gov |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Mainstem / Mainstem |
Short description | Investigate effects of rearing & river conditions on migration & smolt-to-adult survival in salmon & steelhead, maintain database, develop non-invasive methods to assess smoltification, provide technical assistance to fishery agencies. |
Target species | Snake River and Columbia River wild and hatchery juvenile salmonid migrants including run-at-large chinook, coho, and sockeye salmon and steelhead. Specific stock locations include: Snake River steelhead; Snake River fall chinook; Wenatchee River steelhead; Elochoman coho; Cowlitz River spring chinook, coho and steelhead; Tucannon River spring chinook; Lyons Ferry fall chinook; Wind River steelhead. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $115,000 | |
Fringe | $34,500 | |
Supplies | $5,000 | |
Capital | $5,000 | |
Travel | $3,000 | |
Indirect | $63,650 | |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
Other | $5,000 | |
$231,150 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $231,150 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $231,150 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Project objective 1 is updated annually based on the concerns and requests of Columbia basin fish managers and their needs. Objective 2 carries over annually and provides the long term evaluation needed to develop new management goals based on past experience. Objectives that outline tasks specific to method development (3) or evaluate particular life history stages such as rearing, are designed as single year projects (4), with the replication necessary for anadromous species generally provided by three years of release data, and should include some provision for monitoring and evaluation of adult returns.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Comment:
Comment:
Notwithstanding their overall evaluation, ISRP reviewers note their belief that time-travel analysis is outdated and that the title of the proposal does not seem to fit the objectives and tasks proposed. Documentation of the need for continuing consultation on interagency, cooperative projects should be strengthened. This project seems to be headed into a long-term monitoring program. The review team asks if this is the best location for maintaining a long-term database and if the data are available via Streamnet.