FY 1999 proposal 198802200

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
198802200 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Trap and Haul in the Umatilla and Walla Walla Basins
Proposal ID	198802200
Organization	Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Gary James
Mailing address	P.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801
Phone / email	5412764109 / jaburke@ucinet.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Mid-Columbia / Umatilla
Short description	Operate passage facilities, flow enhancement measures, trap facilities and hauling equipment to maximize juvenile and adult migrant survival in Umatilla and Walla Walla basins.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$145,000
Fringe		$42,000
Supplies		$10,000
Operating		$20,000
Travel		$25,000
Indirect		$82,000
Subcontractor		$185,000
		$509,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$509,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$509,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Incompletion of key passage or production components for the Walla Walla basin would reduce the effort required in that basin. Similarly, major milestones would be completion of these same key components. There are no major constraints or milestones which affect the Umatilla portion of the project.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Nonwatershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete: Need more details in methods. On page 9, paragraph 6, the proposal mentions project guidelines but doesn't specify what they are. Also on the top of page 10 in paragraph 1, the proposal refers to project methods in an annual report but doesn't describe them. The methods in that report should be included (at least enough of them to be able to allow the reader/reviewer to determine if the project is using sound protocols).

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Reduction justification forthcoming

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This project has been going on for almost 10 years, but little direct evidence is presented on how well it is working. It needs greater demonstration of the objectives and the benefits.

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$362,164	$362,164	$362,164

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website