FY 1999 proposal 198805305

Additional documents

TitleType
198805305 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleNE Oregon Hatchery Master Plan and Facilities - ODFW
Proposal ID198805305
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJames V. Phelps
Mailing address107 20th St. La Grande, OR 97850
Phone / email5419632138 / neroadmn@oregontrail.net
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short descriptionDevelop the Walla Walla, Grande Ronde, and Imnaha Master Plans. Develop facility designs and costs with schedule for implementation. Construct and operate new facilities as agreed between comanagers; initially, operate for Captive and Endemic Brood.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8805301 NE Oregon Outplanting Facility Master Plan Nez Perce comanagement, Lostine River.
8805302 NE Oregon Hatchery - Grande Ronde Satellite Facilities CTUIR comanagement on upper Grande Ronde River and Catherine Creek.
9202604 Spring Chinook Salmon Early Life History Grande Ronde Basin early life history M&E.
9604400 Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood Capitol Construction Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood Capitol Construction
9801001 Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood O&M, M&E, Fish Health Monit Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood O&M, M&E, Fish Health Monitoring.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $82,000
Fringe $29,500
Supplies $24,000
Operating $47,000
Capital $41,000
Travel $17,800
Indirect $45,900
Subcontractor $0
$287,200
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$287,200
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$287,200
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Minor corrections needed. Not enough detail to determine if resources are enough or appropriate in order to accomplish project. No data on past costs are included. A very long list of personnel is included but no information of FTE amounts for each person is included. The proposal also needs to include qualifications statements for key personnel.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Reduce time for review and planning (obj.2 and 6)
Recommendation:
Grande Ronde NEOH - Inadequate as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is in part a proposal to construct satellite hatchery facilities and ponds. The proposal does not describe how broodstock will be mined, which is a risky endeavor. The proposal does not adequately describe the relation of the work to the other Grande Ronde NEOH facilities. The methods should give assurance that the remaining population will not be harmed by the proposed activities, but they do not.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$69,000 $20,000 $20,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website