FY 1999 proposal 198805305

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
198805305 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	NE Oregon Hatchery Master Plan and Facilities - ODFW
Proposal ID	198805305
Organization	Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	James V. Phelps
Mailing address	107 20th St. La Grande, OR 97850
Phone / email	5419632138 / neroadmn@oregontrail.net
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short description	Develop the Walla Walla, Grande Ronde, and Imnaha Master Plans. Develop facility designs and costs with schedule for implementation. Construct and operate new facilities as agreed between comanagers; initially, operate for Captive and Endemic Brood.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description
8805301	NE Oregon Outplanting Facility Master Plan	Nez Perce comanagement, Lostine River.
8805302	NE Oregon Hatchery - Grande Ronde Satellite Facilities	CTUIR comanagement on upper Grande Ronde River and Catherine Creek.
9202604	Spring Chinook Salmon Early Life History	Grande Ronde Basin early life history M&E.
9604400	Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood Capitol Construction	Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood Capitol Construction
9801001	Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood O&M, M&E, Fish Health Monit	Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood O&M, M&E, Fish Health Monitoring.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$82,000
Fringe		$29,500
Supplies		$24,000
Operating		$47,000
Capital		$41,000
Travel		$17,800
Indirect		$45,900
Subcontractor		$0
		$287,200

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$287,200
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$287,200
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Nonwatershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Minor corrections needed. Not enough detail to determine if resources are enough or appropriate in order to accomplish project. No data on past costs are included. A very long list of personnel is included but no information of FTE amounts for each person is included. The proposal also needs to include qualifications statements for key personnel.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Reduce time for review and planning (obj.2 and 6)

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Grande Ronde NEOH - Inadequate as a set

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is in part a proposal to construct satellite hatchery facilities and ponds. The proposal does not describe how broodstock will be mined, which is a risky endeavor. The proposal does not adequately describe the relation of the work to the other Grande Ronde NEOH facilities. The methods should give assurance that the remaining population will not be harmed by the proposed activities, but they do not.

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
capital

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$69,000	$20,000	$20,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website