FY 1999 proposal 198810804
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Streamnet: The Northwest Aquatic Information Network |
| Proposal ID | 198810804 |
| Organization | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Drew O. Parkin |
| Mailing address | 45 SE 82nd Dr., Suite 100 Gladstone, OR 97027-2522 |
| Phone / email | 5036505400 / Drew_Parkin@psmfc.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Provide data and data services to the FWP by 1) compiling essential, regionally consistent biological data, 2) creating access to data via the Internet, StreamNet Library, and custom products, and 3) giving technical support to FWP activities. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 8812001 |
Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (and associated projects) |
StreamNet will consolidate and provide Internet access to project data |
| 9700400 |
Resident Fish Stock Status Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams |
StreamNet will provide technical support and Internet access to project data. |
| 5502000 |
Snake River Native Salmonid Assessment |
StreamNet will provide technical support and Internet access to project data. |
|
Proposed FY 99 Watershed Analysis project (CRITFC) |
StreamNet data development activities would be tailored to meet watershed analysis data needs; projects would be mutually supportive. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$1,079,500 |
| Fringe |
|
$307,500 |
| Supplies |
|
$218,000 |
| Travel |
|
$48,500 |
| Indirect |
|
$316,500 |
| Subcontractor |
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Shoshone-Bannock Tribes; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Yakama Indian Nation; Nez Perce Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation |
$0 |
| $1,970,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,970,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,970,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: If a primary data provider is unable to supply data, staff will need to identify other means to secure these data or shift to other data tasks. The breadth of the project ensures that no staff time is lost due to delays in data availability.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Increase $100K from FY98 for watershed coordination database work
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
Notwithstanding their evaluation, ISRP reviewers suggest that the proposal could have better documented its relationship to PTAGIS and other databases in the basin. One reviewer asks if the data are different than in PTAGIS, or is the effort redundant? The Council appears to be headed toward a very long-term commitment of funds with this project.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $2,315,033 |
$2,315,033 |
$2,315,033 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website