FY 1999 proposal 198810804

Additional documents

TitleType
198810804 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleStreamnet: The Northwest Aquatic Information Network
Proposal ID198810804
OrganizationPacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDrew O. Parkin
Mailing address45 SE 82nd Dr., Suite 100 Gladstone, OR 97027-2522
Phone / email5036505400 / Drew_Parkin@psmfc.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinSystemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionProvide data and data services to the FWP by 1) compiling essential, regionally consistent biological data, 2) creating access to data via the Internet, StreamNet Library, and custom products, and 3) giving technical support to FWP activities.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8812001 Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (and associated projects) StreamNet will consolidate and provide Internet access to project data
9700400 Resident Fish Stock Status Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams StreamNet will provide technical support and Internet access to project data.
5502000 Snake River Native Salmonid Assessment StreamNet will provide technical support and Internet access to project data.
Proposed FY 99 Watershed Analysis project (CRITFC) StreamNet data development activities would be tailored to meet watershed analysis data needs; projects would be mutually supportive.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $1,079,500
Fringe $307,500
Supplies $218,000
Travel $48,500
Indirect $316,500
Subcontractor Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Shoshone-Bannock Tribes; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Yakama Indian Nation; Nez Perce Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation $0
$1,970,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$1,970,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$1,970,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: If a primary data provider is unable to supply data, staff will need to identify other means to secure these data or shift to other data tasks. The breadth of the project ensures that no staff time is lost due to delays in data availability.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Increase $100K from FY98 for watershed coordination database work
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

Notwithstanding their evaluation, ISRP reviewers suggest that the proposal could have better documented its relationship to PTAGIS and other databases in the basin. One reviewer asks if the data are different than in PTAGIS, or is the effort redundant? The Council appears to be headed toward a very long-term commitment of funds with this project.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$2,315,033 $2,315,033 $2,315,033

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website