FY 1999 proposal 198902401

Additional documents

TitleType
198902401 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEvaluate Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla
Proposal ID198902401
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameRichard Carmichael
Mailing address211 Inlow Hall, EOU, 1410 ā€œLā€ Avenue La Grande, OR 97850
Phone / email5419623777 / odfw2@eou.edu
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Umatilla
Short descriptionDetermine migration patterns, evaluate health, estimate abundance and survival of outmigrating juvenile salmonids in the Umatilla River; investigate effect of environmental variables on fish migration and video-document passage at Three Mile Falls Dam.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9000500 Umatilla Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation - hatchery effectiveness Migration monitoring provides data on in-basin migration success of different rearing/release strategies
8343600 Umatilla Passage O&M -passage facility O&M Study results provide information on juvenile fish passage problems at Three Mile Falls Dam
9000501 Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation - natural production success Lower river monitoring provides information on species life history, abundance, survival; supplements PIT tagging of natural steelhead.
88022 Umatilla River Basin Trap and Haul Program-collect/transport juvenile fish Sampling at Westland Canal trap provides species composition and weight data for transport operations

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $94,867
Fringe $34,152
Supplies $1,000
Operating $8,791
Travel $4,160
Indirect $32,740
Subcontractor $0
$175,710
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$175,710
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$175,710
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Time required to complete annual progress report for 1998 and final completion report for project years 1994 - 1998 may extend date beyond 9/1999.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Same as original FY98 proposal ā€“ need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Funding increase described in the proposal revision
Recommendation:
Adequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal included a good explanation of hypotheses, assumptions and products. However, hypothesis three is inadequate, and technical justification is weak. The proposal referred extensively to other documents but did not give a complete explanation of why we need to know about juvenile migration and what problem will it solve. The project should be coordinated with Umatilla satellite facility project 8343500. Four years most likely will not provide enough time to develop a solid database and draw conclusions. The study should extend one generation beyond the February 1996 flood. Publication of results should include more than just an annual report.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$306,235 $306,235 $306,235

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website