FY 1999 proposal 198903500

Additional documents

TitleType
198903500 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleUmatilla Hatchery Operation and Maintenance
Proposal ID198903500
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameTrent W. Stickell
Mailing addressOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 59 Portland, OR 97207
Phone / email5038725252 / trent.w.stickell@state.or.us
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Umatilla
Short descriptionUmatilla Fish hatchery produces the majority of the fish production for the purposes of rehabiliting chinook salmonand enhancing steelhead populations in the Umatilla River.
Target speciesCarson stock spring chinook, Upriver bright stock fall chinook, Umatilla River stock summer stelhead
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8902401 Juvenile salmonid outmigration and survival in the Umatilla River Migration monitoring assist in evaluating in-basin migration success of different rearing/release strategies.
9000501 Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation-natural production success. This study evaluates the amount and extent of salmonid natural production in the Umatilla Basin. Identification is critical to determining the success of the hatchery programs designed to restore and supplement natural populations.
8802200 Umatilla River Basin Trap and Haul Program-collect /transport juvenile fish This project provides low water passage for fish in the Umatilla River by trapping fish and hauling them to sections of the river with adequate flow.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel Salaries $271,406
Fringe OPE @ 37% $100,420
Supplies $60,504
Operating $242,762
Capital $10,500
Indirect @23% $137,117
Subcontractor NA $0
$822,709
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$822,709
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$822,709
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Continuation of this program may be contingent upon the renewal of the Biological Opinion for 1995-98 Hatchery Operations in the Columbia River Basin.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Hold at FY98 funding due to budget constraints
Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

Many details were left out. This project should be examined in the comprehensive hatchery review. Were statements about increased survival from acclimation actually realized or assumed? This project should be combined with 9000500 so the total cost of hatchery operations could be displayed.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$875,000 $875,000 $875,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website