FY 1999 proposal 198906200

Additional documents

TitleType
198906200 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titlePrepare Draft Annual Implementation Work Plan
Proposal ID198906200
OrganizationColumbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBrian J. Allee, Ph.D.
Mailing address2501 SW First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201
Phone / email5033267031 / brian@cbfwf.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinSystemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionCoordinate and promote comprehensive and effective planning and implementation of fish and wildlife programs in the Columbia River Basin, improve the quality of fish and wildlife decision-making and to influence other regional decision-makers.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $419,466
Fringe $163,592
Supplies $30,403
Operating $5,783
Travel $272,207
Indirect $286,871
Subcontractor $91,135
$1,269,457
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$1,269,457
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$1,269,457
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: N/A


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Form incomplete, need minor corrections/addition. On page 9, paragraph 4, the past history cost spreadsheet is missing. On page 7, objectives appear to be mixed up.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

$500K increase from Reserve for Member participation in regional coordination (Volume I, Section IV).
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a necessary project that should be supported (ranked in the upper midrange of the set), but the proposal has problems. The objectives include more than the title suggests and seem to describe all the objectives of CBFWA. Past costs are not included. The section on project history is not responsive to the BPA instructions. Information that would have been useful if the proposal is for all of CBFWA funding would include how/when was CBFWA formed, when did the AIWPs start, when was the first Multiyear Work Plan, and what are the relationships to the Foundation. OR, if the proposal is limited to the title, then we need more specific history of the AIWP. The proposal should better describe methods, infrastructure, and specialist groups.