FY 1999 proposal 198906900
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Annual Coded Wire Tag Program - Missing Production OR Htc (ODFW) |
Proposal ID | 198906900 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Mark Lewis |
Mailing address | 28655 Hwy. 34 Corvallis, OR 97333 |
Phone / email | 5417574263 / lewisma@ccmail.orst.edu |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Expand coded wire tag program to include all ODFW Columbia Basin hatchery coho and chinook production releases not tagged by other programs. Monitor hatchery salmon survival trends, evaluate hatchery techniques, provide information for fish management. |
Target species | Chinook and Coho salmon stocks reared at Oregon Columbia Basin Hatcheries. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
8906500 |
Hatchery Production OR/WA/ID (USFWS) |
Complimentary project for USFWS hatcheries |
8906600 |
Annual Coded Wire Tag Program - Missing Production WA HTCH (WDF) |
Complimentary project for WDF hatcheries |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
Proj. Supervisor, Tagging Supervisors, Temporary Taggers |
$40,276 |
Fringe |
Supervisors @ 35%, Taggers @ 43% |
$15,469 |
Supplies |
Coded-wire tags = $45,900, Visual implant tags = $5,000 |
$59,790 |
Operating |
Obj 2. Tag rec. (est 5,146 @ $7/head) |
$36,022 |
Travel |
Mileage @ PerDiem |
$3,040 |
Indirect |
@ 22.9% |
$35,403 |
Subcontractor |
None |
$0 |
| $190,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $190,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $190,000 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Production and release of hatchery salmonids in the Columbia Basin is regulated by NMFS under the Endangered Species Act. Specific groups to be tagged depend on funding for the production and tagging of hatchery salmon in Oregon. .
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
As with 8906500, the title is bad and there is a need for review and coordination across the coded-wire tag projects. However, this proposal was better written and ranked in the middle of the set. It includes good objectives, tasks, rationale and history, and it is well related to the Fish and Wildlife Program and the biological opinion. It does not give relationships to the PSMFC coded wire tag project (8201300) and the abstract is poor. Are the data being used as expected?