FY 1999 proposal 199000500

Additional documents

TitleType
199000500 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleUmatilla Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposal ID199000500
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameRichard Carmichael
Mailing address211 Inlow Hall, EOU, 1410 ā€œLā€ Avenue La Grande, OR 97850
Phone / email5419623777 / odfw2@eou.edu
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Umatilla
Short descriptionEvaluate juvenile rearing, marking, tagging, survival, stock life history, fish health, mass marking, straying, sport fishing and catch contribution for salmon and steelhead reared in oxygen supplemented and standard raceways at Umatilla Hatchery
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8902401 Juvenile salmonid outmigration and survival in the Umatilla River Migration monitoring assist in evaluating in-basin migration success of different rearing/release strategies
8903500 Umatilla Hatchery Umatilla Hatchery provides the majority of the production for restoring salmon and supplementing steelhead populations in the Umatilla River.
9000501 Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation - natural production success This study evaluates the amount and extent of salmonid natural production in the Umatilla Basin. Identification is critical to determining the success of hatchery programs designed to restore and supplement natural populations.l
8802200 Umatilla River Basin Trap and Haul Program-collect/transport juvenile fish This project provides low water passage for fish in the Umatilla River by trapping fish and hauling to sections of the river with adequate flow

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel Costs are for FY98 $196,745
Fringe Costs are for FY98 $73,207
Supplies Costs are for FY98 $197,442
Operating Costs are for FY98 $0
Capital Costs are for FY98 $2,500
Tag NA $37,700
Travel Costs are for FY98 $780
Indirect Costs are for FY98 $107,212
Subcontractor $0
$615,586
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$615,586
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$615,586
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Hatchery water shortages and low egg availability may restrict the number of experiments conducted each year. Risks to Snake River stocks are unknown. Poor adult returns and low tag recoveries may necessitate additional releases.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal spelled out the research methods and provided null hypotheses, which the ISRP appreciated. Objectives were clearly stated but the proposal was poorly edited in places. The history of operation of the hatchery has been long enough that a summary of monitoring and evaluation findings should have been presented. Studies on oxygenated raceways in a Willamette River hatchery were recently conducted but were not referenced in this proposal.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$572,848 $572,848 $572,848

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website