FY 1999 proposal 199001800
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199001800 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Evaluate Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvements of Tribs. to L. Roosev |
| Proposal ID | 199001800 |
| Organization | Colville Confederated Tribes (CCT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | David Alexis |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155 |
| Phone / email | 5096348845 / cctfish@mail.wsu.edu |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Upper Columbia Mainstem |
| Short description | Increase quality/quantity of spawning/rearing habitat in selected trib streams to L. Roosevelt by eliminating migration barriers, improved riparian conditions, improved instream habitat & protracted late summer flow conditions. |
| Target species | adfluvial rainbow trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $91,000 | |
| Fringe | $2,730 | |
| Supplies | $3,312 | |
| Operating | $3,500 | |
| Travel | $24,300 | |
| Indirect | $35,672 | |
| Subcontractor | $6,183 | |
| Other | $1,303 | |
| $168,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $168,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $168,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Presentation: The goal of this project is to provide a subsistence and recreational fishery through natural production of native rainbow trout in the San Poil River. The initial phases of the project focused on habitat improvements (instream structures, large woody debris, fencing and channel restoration) in 5 tributaries. The habitat work has been completed and the project has 2 more years of monitoring (population sampling and adult returns).Questions/Answers:
Is this an adequate length of time to monitor the effectiveness of the project? Answer: No.
Can other hatchery rainbow trout stocked in Lake Roosevelt go up the San Poil River? What prevents the hatchery fish from straying? Answer: Yes, hatchery rainbows can go up the San Poil, but we have never caught one in our weirs. We identify hatchery fish by fin condition and FLOY tags.
Screening Criteria: Yes
Technical Criteria: Yes
Programmatic Criteria: Yes
General Comment: There is some concern about how hatchery rainbow trout will impact wild rainbow trout.
Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
This proposal is well organized and includes good descriptions and goals for evaluation of habitat improvement activities. However, the proposal provides no history and no summary or descriptions of concrete results from past activities and monitoring; thus, there is no indication of how good their data really are. If the sampling is done primarily in shallow streams and rivers, electrofishing would be a better sampling method than hydroacoustics. A great deal of work is proposed (perhaps overly optimistically) to be completed in one year.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $268,500 | $268,500 | $268,500 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website