FY 1999 proposal 199001800

Additional documents

TitleType
199001800 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEvaluate Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvements of Tribs. to L. Roosev
Proposal ID199001800
OrganizationColville Confederated Tribes (CCT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDavid Alexis
Mailing addressP.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155
Phone / email5096348845 / cctfish@mail.wsu.edu
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinUpper Columbia / Upper Columbia Mainstem
Short descriptionIncrease quality/quantity of spawning/rearing habitat in selected trib streams to L. Roosevelt by eliminating migration barriers, improved riparian conditions, improved instream habitat & protracted late summer flow conditions.
Target speciesadfluvial rainbow trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $91,000
Fringe $2,730
Supplies $3,312
Operating $3,500
Travel $24,300
Indirect $35,672
Subcontractor $6,183
Other $1,303
$168,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$168,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$168,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Presentation: The goal of this project is to provide a subsistence and recreational fishery through natural production of native rainbow trout in the San Poil River. The initial phases of the project focused on habitat improvements (instream structures, large woody debris, fencing and channel restoration) in 5 tributaries. The habitat work has been completed and the project has 2 more years of monitoring (population sampling and adult returns).

Questions/Answers:

Is this an adequate length of time to monitor the effectiveness of the project? Answer: No.

Can other hatchery rainbow trout stocked in Lake Roosevelt go up the San Poil River? What prevents the hatchery fish from straying? Answer: Yes, hatchery rainbows can go up the San Poil, but we have never caught one in our weirs. We identify hatchery fish by fin condition and FLOY tags.

Screening Criteria: Yes

Technical Criteria: Yes

Programmatic Criteria: Yes

General Comment: There is some concern about how hatchery rainbow trout will impact wild rainbow trout.


Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal is well organized and includes good descriptions and goals for evaluation of habitat improvement activities. However, the proposal provides no history and no summary or descriptions of concrete results from past activities and monitoring; thus, there is no indication of how good their data really are. If the sampling is done primarily in shallow streams and rivers, electrofishing would be a better sampling method than hydroacoustics. A great deal of work is proposed (perhaps overly optimistically) to be completed in one year.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$268,500 $268,500 $268,500

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website