FY 1999 proposal 199004401
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199004401 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Lake Creek Land Acquisition and Enhancement |
Proposal ID | 199004401 |
Organization | Coeur d’Alene Tribe (CDA Tribe) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Kelly Lillengreen |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 408 Plummer, ID 83851 |
Phone / email | 2086865302 / kellylil@iea.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Coeur d'Alene |
Short description | Purchase and enhance 70 acres of emergent wetlands, 180 acres of forested/riparian wetlands, and 1850 acres of adjacent upland forest and shrub communities. Protects and enhances a key watershed on the Reservation; complements ongoing fisheries work. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9004400 | Implement Fisheries Enhancement Opportunities Coeur d’Alene Reservation | Project focuses on protection and restoration in four key watersheds on the Reservation. Lake Creek is one of these drainages. Complements existing resident fish habitat restoration work. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $28,000 | |
Fringe | $8,400 | |
Operating | also includes projected enhancement costs | $120,000 |
Travel | $5,000 | |
Indirect | 31.6% minus capital and subcontracts | $51,002 |
Subcontractor | Not determined yet\ | $0 |
$212,402 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $212,402 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $212,402 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Negotiation of purchase price may be a constraint
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Operations and maintenance budget reduced because acquisition is not completedComment:
This proposal is well organized and gives important details for judging its value to the fish and wildlife program: specific parcels of land appear to have been selected for acquisition, the focus of activities is on riparian habitat, and benefits to both fish and wildlife are listed. However, the methods for restoration are not well described and the proposal is inconsistent on objectives and budget. The budget for land acquisition appears not to be included.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$160,020 | $160,020 | $160,020 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website