FY 1999 proposal 199101901
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199101901 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Hungry Horse Fisheries Mitigation Plan Flathead Lake |
| Proposal ID | 199101901 |
| Organization | Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Barry Hansen |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 278 Pablo, MT 59855 |
| Phone / email | 4066752700 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Flathead |
| Short description | Monitor and implement fisheries improvement activities within the Flathead Lake Basin. |
| Target species | cutthroat bull trout lake trout kokanee |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $34,000 | |
| Fringe | $6,000 | |
| Supplies | $8,000 | |
| Operating | $2,500 | |
| Travel | $2,000 | |
| Indirect | $7,500 | |
| Subcontractor | $5,000 | |
| $65,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $65,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $65,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None foreseen
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Presentation: This project began in 1992 and is the lake monitoring component of the Hungry Horse Mitigation Plan. It monitors community structure, biological responses and bioenergetics ( mysis shrimp - lake trout - whitefish) in Flathead Lake (but not the tributaries). Indirect costs are 13.2%. This is a collaborative effort and activities (e.g. Dayton Creek) are coordinated with the ongoing watershed project (9608701).Questions/Answers:
Screening Criteria: Yes
Technical Criteria: Yes
Programmatic Criteria: Yes
Comment:
Comment:
This is a marginal proposal that was one of the poorest in the set. It reads as a monitoring and evaluation project for basic fisheries data: creel survey, fish sampling. It needs to be part of an overall umbrella project for all Hungry Horse projects, but the proposal itself does not relate the work to other Hungry Horse projects. The standard surveys are good for long-term data records. The status of the populations was not described well enough to be sure the next steps are needed. The work plan for tributary reclamation is not clear. The proposal is linked administratively with other projects, but division of labor is not clearly presented.REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $143,942 | $143,942 | $143,942 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website