FY 1999 proposal 199105700

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
199105700 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Yakima Phase 2 Screen Fabrication
Proposal ID	199105700
Organization	Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Yakima Screen Shop (WDFW, YSS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	John A. Easterbrooks
Mailing address	3705 W. Washington Ave. Yakima, WA 98902
Phone / email	5095752734 / eastejae@dfw.wa.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima
Short description	YSS fabricates and installs fish screens and all miscellaneous metalwork for Yakima Basin Phase II screen projects. New fish screens prevent loss of juvenile anadromous and resident fish in gravity irrigation diversions.
Target species	Yakima Basin Spring Chinook, Steelhead, and Coho

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$62,500
Fringe		$18,700
Supplies		$62,600
Travel		$1,500
Indirect		$7,800
Subcontractor		$3,200
Other	Admin overhead	$29,700
		$186,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$186,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$186,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Delays in screen civil works construction caused by diversion water rights uncertainty (court adjudication), engineering design bottlenecks, property acquisition delays or funding constraints affects the Yakima Screen Shop fabrication schedule. Civil works delays usually result in deferred screen fabrication and unspent funds during a budget cycle.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Combine with 8506200, 9107500, and 9200900.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Adequate

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a good, straightforward proposal. The proposed work is not easily amenable to scientific review, but the proposal does provide the necessary information for the type of project and is a needed element of work. It explains that monitoring is covered in another proposal.

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
capital

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$0	$28,195	$28,195

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website