FY 1999 proposal 199107300

Additional documents

TitleType
199107300 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleIdaho Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Program (INPMEP)
Proposal ID199107300
OrganizationIdaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDoug Nemeth
Mailing address1414 E. Locust Lane Nampa, ID 83686
Phone / email2084658404 / dnemeth@idfg.state.id.us
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Salmon, Clearwater
Short descriptionThe INPMEP collects, manages, and analyzes data describing the status and survival of spring/summer chinook salmon and steelhead populations in Idaho. The INPMEP provides long-term monitoring information necessary to evaluate recovery efforts.
Target speciesSnake River spring chinook, summer chinook, steelhead
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8909800 Idaho Supplementation Studies (IDFG) 8909800 supplies to the INPMEP samples for age analysis and genetic analysis, production and productivitiy data, and PIT tags fish used in mainstem survival analysis. Objective 2, of INPMEP is a component of 8909800.
8909802 Salmon Supplementation Studies in ID Rivers (NPT 8909800 supplies to the INPMEP samples for age analysis and genetic analysis, production and productivitiy data, and PIT tags fish used in mainstem survival analysis.
8909803 Salmon Supplementation Studies in ID Rivers (SBT) Same as above
8909801 Salmon Supplementation Studies in ID Rivers (USFWS) Same as above
9005500 Steelhead Supp.Studies in ID Rivers, (IDFG) Same as above

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $286,278
Fringe $92,949
Supplies $12,500
Operating $95,050
Capital $13,000
Tag 25,000 $72,500
Travel Includes field groceries, ($19,950) $30,150
Indirect $129,232
Subcontractor Nez Perce Tribe; Shoshone-BannockTribes; USFWS $0
$731,659
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$731,659
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$731,659
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Because the objectives and tasks of this program are monitoring and analysis, there are no constraints other than funding availability. .


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal is for archival data, including data from the supplementation studies. The proposal is diffuse and unfocused, with no clear relationship of activities. The description of tasks lacks detail, and sampling procedures are not described. The proposal needs to provide a conceptual framework for evaluating the data. The proposal does not describe the quality of the data or how that might be assessed. For instance, are data adequate to detect status and trends of populations?
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$884,640 $884,640 $884,640

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website