FY 1999 proposal 199202601
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Grande Ronde Model Watershed - Project Planning Support |
| Proposal ID | 199202601 |
| Organization | Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program; Union & Wallowa Counties (GRMWP) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Patty Perry |
| Mailing address | 10901 Island Ave. La Grande, OR 97850 |
| Phone / email | 5419626590 / perryp@eou.edu |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Grande Ronde |
| Short description | Coordinate, plan, implement, monitor habitat restoration in T&E chinook & steelhead streams; build community participation, develop watershed planning; conduct seminars; interagency coordination in habitat restoration. |
| Target species | Snake River spring chinook salmon; Snake River summer steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$152,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$26,900 |
| Supplies |
|
$15,000 |
| Operating |
|
$42,500 |
| Travel |
|
$5,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$8,000 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$35,000 |
| Other |
|
$8,000 |
| $292,400 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $292,400 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $292,400 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Landowner willingness to participate in the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program; inability to fund the program or project activities..
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Explain why annual funding of data compilation and conducting assessments is critical year after year.Management Issue: Explain why the personnel costs are not excessive for the BPA portion of the responsibility.
Technical Issue: Explain how the project meets the "watershed coordinator project" criteria – especially with respect to the direct benefits to fish and wildlife.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The ISRP found this to be a very good watershed council proposal. The project appears to have a good track record of success, with a technical advisory committee. The description of the monitoring and evaluation could be improved to provide more detail.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $1,343,166 |
$1,343,166 |
$1,343,166 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website