FY 1999 proposal 199204000

Additional documents

TitleType
199204000 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleRedfish Lake Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Rearing and Research
Proposal ID199204000
OrganizationNational Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameTom Flagg
Mailing addressP.O. Box 130 Manchester, WA 98353
Phone / email2069427181 / Tom.Flagg@NOAA.Gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Salmon
Short descriptionIncubate and rear Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstocks. Provide pre-spawning adults, eyed eggs, and juveniles to aid recovery of this ESA-listed endangered stock in Idaho.
Target speciesESA-listed Snake River sockeye salmon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9107200 Redfish Lake sockeye captive broodstock program Idaho Department of Fish and Game is also maintaining captive broodstocks for Snake River sockeye salmon to avoid catastrophic loss of the gene pool and for rebuilding efforts
9107100 Snake River sockeye salmon habitat The Shoshone-Bannock Tribe of Idaho is conducting habitat and limnological research for rebuilding efforts for Snake River sockeye salmon
9009300 Genetic analysis of Oncorhynchus nerke (ESA) The University of Idaho has been conducting genetic analyses of Snake River sockeye salmon
9305600 Assessment of captive broodstock technology Refinement of captive broodstock technology is necessary to maximize potential of captive broodstock recovery programs for ESA-listed stocks of Pacific salmon in the Columbia River Basin

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $146,200
Fringe $47,100
Supplies $125,400
Travel $20,800
Indirect $80,200
Subcontractor N/A $80,300
$500,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$500,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$500,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Schedule may be constrained by population viability of ESA-listed stocks in this recovery program. If population numbers are still low by the year 2001, then captive broodstocks may have to be continued to protect the gene pools.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal addresses a critical situation, as very few sockeye have returned to Redfish Lake in recent years. The size of the remaining fish population constrains what can be done, and it may be too late for captive broodstock to be effective. Nevertheless, the attempt to preserve the stock is warranted.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$737,242 $980,000 $980,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website