FY 1999 proposal 199301900
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Hood River Production Program - Oak Springs, Powerdale, Parkdale O&M |
| Proposal ID | 199301900 |
| Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWSRO) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Michael D. Jennings |
| Mailing address | 3430 W 10th St. The Dalles, OR 97058 |
| Phone / email | 5412966866 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Hood |
| Short description | Restore depressed populations of summer and winter steelhead and re-establish a self-sustaining spring chinook salmon population… |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$162,441 |
| Fringe |
|
$45,977 |
| Supplies |
|
$55,615 |
| Operating |
|
$26,466 |
| Capital |
|
$20,000 |
| Travel |
|
$3,550 |
| Indirect |
|
$133,018 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$20,500 |
| $467,567 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $467,567 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $467,567 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
HRPP Adequate as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
Regardless of the adequate evaluation, the proposal needs to better describe methods and tasks. There are different objectives listed on pages 3 and 8. The proposal contains considerable internal redundancy, although it is fairly complete and roughly comparable to the other Hood River Production Program proposals. It suffered from deficiencies in details on the mating matrix design, small broodstock sample sizes, and justifications for the sizes (or lack thereof). Even though there are separate Hood River Production Program monitoring and evaluation projects 8805303 and 8805304, they should monitor and evaluate the operation and maintenance work.