FY 1999 proposal 199303800
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | North Fork John Day Area Riparian Fencing |
| Proposal ID | 199303800 |
| Organization | USDA Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest (USFS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | John Sanchez |
| Mailing address | 2517 SW Hailey Ave. Pendleton, OR 97801 |
| Phone / email | 5412783819 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / John Day |
| Short description | Project primarily consists of resetting and operating seasonal electric fence and maintenance of riparian barb wire exclosure fences. This O&M project is critical in protecting riparian vegetation recovery. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
| 8400800 |
NFJD Habitat Improvement |
Funds were transferred to this project |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
| Personnel |
|
$50,600 |
| Supplies |
|
$6,100 |
| Operating |
|
$1,000 |
| Travel |
|
$3,800 |
| Indirect |
|
$6,500 |
| Subcontractor |
N/A |
$0 |
| $68,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $68,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $68,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None anticipated
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Management Issue: Describe why a permanent fence (which is more cost effective in the long term) is not being used. Need description of the annual cost savings of annual re-wiring due to the posts now being in place.Management Issue: Need to address whether a less structural approach, such as removing the grazing, would be more cost effective.
Technical Issue: Need to describe the habitat response or other benefits from this fence.
Management Issue: Potential in-lieu issue (Is the need for the work caused by inadequate federal management?).
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The revisions do not significantly change the original proposal. The original proposal falls into unacceptable level because of insignificant description and little justification. However, the purposes appear worthwhile.