FY 1999 proposal 199306000
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Evaluate Columbia River Select Area Fisheries |
| Proposal ID | 199306000 |
| Organization | Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, Washington Dept. Fish & Wildlife, Clatsop County Economic Development Council (ODFW, WDFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Paul Hirose |
| Mailing address | 17330 SE Evelyn St. Clackamas, OR 97015 |
| Phone / email | 5036572000 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Lower Columbia Mainstem |
| Short description | Protect depressed stocks by determining the feasibility of creating and expanding select area (terminal) fisheries to allow harvest of strong anadromous salmonid stocks. |
| Target species | All ESA “listed” salmon species and candidate species |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$416,550 |
| Fringe |
|
$159,134 |
| Supplies |
|
$368,290 |
| Operating |
|
$87,160 |
| Capital |
|
$219,600 |
| Travel |
|
$36,030 |
| Indirect |
|
$170,766 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$42,470 |
| $1,500,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,500,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,500,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Project is most influenced by extent of budget and availability of juvenile fish. This ongoing project’s schedule has plans for annual additions of sites and increases in fish reared. Local worst ever oceanic conditions will hinder evaluation of survival rates.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete: Scientific justification of use of non-local stocks in particular how that relates to ESA and state wild fish policies.
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Describe what are the additional planned expansions and when will they occur?
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Clifton site capitalization costs of $100,000 are deferred for future consideration
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposal is rated adequate, however there are criticisms. The proposal does not provide good information on past results; the sponsors state conclusions rather than offer evidence; and stocks to be used for production are not specified. Further, the proposal discusses strays into other hatcheries, but not into streams. Once fisheries are developed and clientele are established, pressures may emerge to continue the program despite possible impacts. If the sponsors truly wish a commercial fishery for the Lower Columbia, the ISRP reviewers comment that this may be it -- but the proposal begs considerable improvement. Some of the listed objectives may already have been accomplished as well. The ISRP urges that an independent source conduct monitoring, and that BPA closely examine the budget. The investment of $4.1 million thus far to determine feasibility should be examined.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $1,673,567 |
$1,673,567 |
$1,673,567 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website