FY 1999 proposal 199306600

Additional documents

TitleType
199306600 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleOregon Fish Screening Project FY99 Proposal
Proposal ID199306600
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameRoy Elicker
Mailing addressP.O. Box 59 Portland, OR 97207
Phone / email5038725252 / Roy.Elicker@state.or.us
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / John Day
Short descriptionConstruct and install approximatley 32 new and replacement fish screening and protection devices, including 2 fishways, in Oregon Water Basins 5,6,&7.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9703500 Eval. of Watershed and Habitat Resp. to Recent Storms:Effects on ESA Salmon Fish protection in project areas.
9703400 Monitoring Fine Sediment Levels in Substrate & Overwinter Sediment in Clean Fish protection in project areas
8402100 Mainstem, Middle Fork, North Fork John Day River - Implementation/O&M Cooperate with private landowners for fish enhancement activities. Share office space.
8400800 North Fork John Day Habitat Improvement Fish protection in project areas
9303800 North Fork John Day Area Riparian Fencing Fish protection in project areas
9605300 North Fork John Day River Dredge Tailings Restoration Project Fish Protection in project areas
9404200 Trout Creek Fish Habitat Restoration Project: Habitat Restoration (fencing, instream structures) in project area

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $130,323
Fringe OPE $50,826
Supplies Service & Supplies $240,035
Operating -NA- $0
Capital -NA- $0
Tag -NA- $0
Travel Per Diem $3,900
Indirect -NA- $0
Subcontractor -NA- $0
Other $97,769
$522,853
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$522,853
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$522,853
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Schedule constraints may occur if: ODFW seasonal employees are not rehired in a timely manner; weather conditions prevent project access; site restraints due to landowner cooperation complications.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)<p>
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Hard to identify what exactly is the base cost - Need to clearly describe the base funding needs for maintenance versus the number and cost for fabrication of new and replacement screens.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

The objectives are not consistently stated throughout the proposal (sections 4 and 7), but it is good that they include the objective to improve survival rates. The monitoring program is not adequately described.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$701,117 $701,117 $701,117

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website