FY 1999 proposal 199403900

Additional documents

TitleType
199403900 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleWallowa Basin Project Planning
Proposal ID199403900
OrganizationNez Perce Tribe (NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDon Bryson
Mailing address201 W. North St., Rm 113 Enterprise, OR 97828
Phone / email5414260119 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short descriptionLiaison between Tribe and Wallowa County; help coordinate efforts by county, landowners, state & federal agencies; help develop action & management plans, restoraton projects, habitat monitoring plan.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $24,694
Fringe $6,174
Supplies $473
Operating $4,456
Travel $5,643
Indirect $12,313
Subcontractor $0
Other $1,560
$55,310
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$55,310
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$55,313
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: 1. The Tribe’s priorities may change. 2. NEPA, NMFS/USF&W consultation, and fill and removal permit applications may take longer than anticipated. 3. Project opportunities may occur which were not anticipated. 4. Land owner availability for projects may change. 5. Unforseen issues (eg. having to fill out two sets of questionnaires like this one plus a mid-year set of questions for FY98 BPA funding).


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Explain how this effort is coordinated with, and does not duplicate the Grande Ronde Model Watershed.

Technical Issue: Explain how this project directly benefits fish and wildlife.

Technical Issue: Resubmit for FY99 work based on approved FY98 funding.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

9403900 is a proposal for a tribal liaison. It should be joined with 9702500, which describes the activities to be done by the liaison. The original proposals did not describe objectives, methods, or technical justification for activities. The revised proposal provides sufficient technical justification and more detail overall on the need for planning and coordination, but it does not clearly explain methods. The project needs to have clear criteria by which success of activities will be evaluated.