FY 1999 proposal 199404200
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Trout Creek Habitat Restoration Project |
| Proposal ID | 199404200 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Ray Hartlerode |
| Mailing address | 3430 W 10th St. The Dalles, OR 97058 |
| Phone / email | 5412968026 / rayh@gorge.net |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Deschutes |
| Short description | Operation and Maintenance of instream and riparian habitat condition. Proactive education, demonstration and implementation of good management practices in the entire Trout Creek basin. Resulting in increased native salmonid and wildlife production.
|
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9306600 |
N.E. Oregon Screens - Trout Creek Fish passage - push-up dam removal |
Shares manpower, equipment, and facilities |
| 9303000 |
Buckhollow Watershed Restoration |
Deschutes basin improvement |
| 9405420 |
Bull Trout studies in Central and N.E. Oregon |
Stock Status and Distribution |
| 9304000 |
Fifteenmile Creek Habitat Restoration project |
Share equipment and manpower |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$117,134 |
| Fringe |
Other personel expenses |
$45,682 |
| Supplies |
Shop rent, vehicle leases and mileage, fencing supplies, equipment repair |
$49,775 |
| Capital |
Stream gauge on Trout Creek to be installed by Water Resources |
$16,400 |
| Travel |
training and per diem |
$1,570 |
| Indirect |
Overhead @ 22.9% |
$49,043 |
| Subcontractor |
Oregon Water Resources; Oregon State Police |
$38,750 |
| Other |
|
$17,446 |
| Other |
|
$17,446 |
| $353,246 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $353,246 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $353,246 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: none
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Concern about excessive O&M costs – describe how the budget is appropriate for the proposed O&M work.Technical Issue: Explain if illegal harvest is a critical limiting factor that justifies the law enforcement task.
Technical Issue: Part of the project should be committed to monitoring the maintenance and operations activities. Need to describe a monitoring program to determine if the original proposal objectives are still being met; and to evaluate the benefits and results from the O&M.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Reduction due to elimination of enforcement task
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
Justification for emphasis on instream structures is not well described. The relationship of this project to a comprehensive strategy for Trout Creek or watershed analysis is not provided. The Trout Creek proposals should be integrated and related to a comprehensive strategy.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $383,662 |
$383,662 |
$383,662 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website