FY 1999 proposal 199404200

Additional documents

TitleType
199404200 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleTrout Creek Habitat Restoration Project
Proposal ID199404200
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameRay Hartlerode
Mailing address3430 W 10th St. The Dalles, OR 97058
Phone / email5412968026 / rayh@gorge.net
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Deschutes
Short descriptionOperation and Maintenance of instream and riparian habitat condition. Proactive education, demonstration and implementation of good management practices in the entire Trout Creek basin. Resulting in increased native salmonid and wildlife production.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9306600 N.E. Oregon Screens - Trout Creek Fish passage - push-up dam removal Shares manpower, equipment, and facilities
9303000 Buckhollow Watershed Restoration Deschutes basin improvement
9405420 Bull Trout studies in Central and N.E. Oregon Stock Status and Distribution
9304000 Fifteenmile Creek Habitat Restoration project Share equipment and manpower

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $117,134
Fringe Other personel expenses $45,682
Supplies Shop rent, vehicle leases and mileage, fencing supplies, equipment repair $49,775
Capital Stream gauge on Trout Creek to be installed by Water Resources $16,400
Travel training and per diem $1,570
Indirect Overhead @ 22.9% $49,043
Subcontractor Oregon Water Resources; Oregon State Police $38,750
Other $17,446
Other $17,446
$353,246
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$353,246
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$353,246
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: none


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Concern about excessive O&M costs – describe how the budget is appropriate for the proposed O&M work.

Technical Issue: Explain if illegal harvest is a critical limiting factor that justifies the law enforcement task.

Technical Issue: Part of the project should be committed to monitoring the maintenance and operations activities. Need to describe a monitoring program to determine if the original proposal objectives are still being met; and to evaluate the benefits and results from the O&M.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Reduction due to elimination of enforcement task
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

Justification for emphasis on instream structures is not well described. The relationship of this project to a comprehensive strategy for Trout Creek or watershed analysis is not provided. The Trout Creek proposals should be integrated and related to a comprehensive strategy.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$383,662 $383,662 $383,662

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website