FY 1999 proposal 199505700
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation |
| Proposal ID | 199505700 |
| Organization | Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (IDFG, SBT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | H. Jerome Hansen |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 |
| Phone / email | 2083343180 / jhansen@idfg.state.id.us |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Snake / Upper Snake |
| Short description | Protect, enhance, maintain wildlife habitats in southern Idaho as ongoing mitigation for Palisades, Minidoka, Anderson Ranch, Black Canyon hydroelectric projects. Activities consistent with Wildlife Mitigation EIS (BPA 1997). |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$125,900 |
| Fringe |
|
$37,770 |
| Supplies |
|
$86,000 |
| Operating |
|
$150,000 |
| Capital |
|
$3,019,975 |
| Travel |
|
$5,500 |
| Indirect |
|
$86,301 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $3,511,446 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $3,511,446 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $3,511,446 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Critical constraints include funding stability over time, changes in land values, and the availability of willing sellers in the primary mitigation focus areas having the highest potential to provide significant, long-term biological benefits and appropriate mitigation for wildlife losses at individual hydroelectric projects.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Reduction in scope of project acquisitions (approx. 150-250 acres)
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a very good wildlife mitigation proposal. It is integrated with other projects and describes benefits to many fish and wildlife species. It identifies criteria for prioritization of lands for acquisition. Negative points include some confusion of tasks with objectives, which are thus sometimes vague, and an emphasis on active restoration without justifying the need for a management intensive approach. The 1999 budget total should be checked.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $4,300,000 |
$4,300,000 |
$4,300,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website