FY 1999 proposal 199506402

Additional documents

TitleType
199506402 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleUpper Yakima Species Interactions Studies
Proposal ID199506402
OrganizationWashington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBill Hopley
Mailing address600 Capitol Way N. Olympia, WA 98501-1091
Phone / email3609022749 / hoplecwh@dfw.wa.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Yakima
Short descriptionEstablish the baseline status of key species; implement experiments to help define the competitive and ecological interactions that may occur among supplemented and non-target species, identify key risks and implement monitoring procedures.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9506404 WDFW Policy/Technical Involvement and Planning for YKFP Provides for WDFW policy and technical planning and coordination for the project. Sets goals and objectives for monitoring and evaluation.
9506406 Monitoring of Supplementation Response Variables for the YKFP Provides lead position in development of the YKFP Monitoring Implementation Plan and implements M & E for long-term fitness and reproductive success response variables
9506405 Further Development of the "NIT" and "LNIT" Strategies for the YKFP Provides field testing and final definition of the new innovative treatments to be used for fish rearing to produce individuals with traits similar to their wild counterparts
8812001 YIN Yakima/Klickitat Project Management Privides for YIN policy and technical planning and coordination for the Project. Sets goals and objectives for monitoring and evalution
9701300 Yakima Cle Elum Hatchery O&M Operation of the experimental hatchery to test the assumption that supplementation is an effective rebuilding approach
9506300 Yakima/Klickitat Monitoring & Evaluation Program Implements portions of the supplementation evaluation as described by the Upper Yakima Spring Chinook Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $230,000
Fringe $60,000
Supplies $31,435
Operating $3,000
Capital $5,000
Travel $6,700
Indirect $63,865
Subcontractor $0
$400,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$400,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$400,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
YKFP Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a well-written proposal with clear objectives. The problem is justified more in terms of policy than technical need. It does not adequately describe results to date. The project has a good history of publication.