FY 1999 proposal 199506404

Additional documents

TitleType
199506404 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titlePolicy/Technical Involvement & Planning for YKFP
Proposal ID199506404
OrganizationWashington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBill Hopley
Mailing address600 Capitol Way N. Olympia, WA 98501-1091
Phone / email3609022749 / hoplecwh@dfw.wa.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Yakima
Short descriptionProvide for WDFW participation in all aspects of YKFP management in terms of policy and the impact of technical matters on policy.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8812001 YIN Yakima/Klickitat Project Management Provides for YIN policy and technical planning and coordination for the Project. Sets goals and objectives for project management and monitoring and evaluation of the YKFP
9701300 Yakima Cle Elum Hatchery O&M Operation of the experimental supplementation to test the assumption that supplementation is an effective rebuilding approach
9506402 Upper Yakima Species Interactions Studies Established the biological baseline for spawning, rearing, and production of rainbow trout, steelhead, spring chinook salmon, and non-target species that may be important effectors or respond to supplementation.
9506405 Further Development of the "NIT" and "LNIT" Strategies for the YKFP Provides for field testing and final definition of the new innovative treatments to be used for fish rearing to produce individuals with traits similar to their wild counterparts.
9506406 Monitoring of Supplementation Response Variables for the YKFP Provides lead position in development of the YKFP Monitoring Implementation Plan and implements M & E for long-term fitness and reproductive success response variables.
9506300 Yakima/Klickitat Monitoring & Evaluation Program Implements portions of the supplementation as described by the Yakima Spring Chinook Monitoring Plan

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $115,000
Fringe $28,750
Supplies $23,600
Travel $13,750
Indirect $43,900
Subcontractor Hatchery Operations Consulting $50,000
$275,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$275,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$275,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: none


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
YKFP Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This project does not present enough information for us to conduct a meaningful review. The purpose and costs of the subcontracts should be specified.