FY 1999 proposal 199506700
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199506700 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Colville Confederated Tribes Performance Contract (Credits For Habitat) |
| Proposal ID | 199506700 |
| Organization | Colville Confederated Tribes (CCT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Steven L. Judd, Senior Wildlife Biologist |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155 |
| Phone / email | 5096348845 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Upper Columbia Mainstem |
| Short description | Evaluate potential mitigation sites by Tribal personnel and purchase when available for inclusion in the Hellsgate Big Game Winter Range project #9204800. Provide some funding for O & M and enhancements to additional acres acquired. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9204800 | Parent project. This project is a segment of it. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Supplies | Enhancement | $50,000 |
| Operating | $50,000 | |
| Subcontractor | Mid Mountain Surveyors | $0 |
| $100,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $100,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $100,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Note % of costs are for FY 99. Lack of adequate funding would cause scheduling delays.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Comment:
This proposal appears to be linked with 9204800 and the two should be combined and the overall program related and explained. Both proposals appear to be purely for operation and maintenance. This proposal says it is for land purchase, but nothing is budgeted for land purchase. The idea is good, but the proposal is inconsistent and unclear.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
capital
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $0 | $0 | $0 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website