FY 1999 proposal 199601900
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199601900 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Second-Tier Database For Ecosystem Focus |
| Proposal ID | 199601900 |
| Organization | Bonneville Power Administration (BPA-EWI) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | David Askren |
| Mailing address | 905 NE 11 St, P.O. Box 3621 [Mail Code EWI-4] Portland, OR 97208-3621 |
| Phone / email | 5032305624 / draskren@bpa.gov |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Provide single-point, Internet-based access to a subset of fishery, hydraulic, project-operation, and environmental information useful in monitoring and evaluating regional efforts to recover threatened or listed anadromous species. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9105100 | Monitoring and Evaluation Statistical Support [UW] | Critical - 9105100’s “RealTime” statistical juvenile salmon migration timing models require input presently only available from 9601900 services. Models are used during migration season in support of weekly hydrosystem operations. |
| 8910700 | Statistical Support for Salmonid Survival Studies [UW] | Critical - 9601900 integrates regionally-distributed data sets for input to 8910700 survival analyses. |
| 8910800 | Monitoring and Evaluation Modeling Support [UW] | Critical - 8910800’s CRISP juvenile salmon hydrosystem survival model requires input presently available only through 9601900 services. Model is used during migration season in support of weekly hydrosystem operations. |
| 940330 | Fish Passage Center [FPC] | Critical - FPC provides passage indices, transport numbers, and hatchery release data to be integrated into second-tier database |
| 9008000 | Columbia Basin PIT-tag Information System [PSMFC] | Critical - PSMFC provides PIT-tag tagging and detection information to be integrated into second-tier database |
| 9207104 | In-season Operations Technical Management Team (TMT) Support-Corps funded. | Critical - 9601900 integrates primary data from Corps of Engineers, PSMFC, and FPC for retrieval, processing, and presentation to TMT to support weekly hydro-operation decision. 9207104 prototyped Internet TMT support systems now used by Corps. |
| 8810804 | StreamNet (aka CIS) | StreamNet is the FWP data archive which could (but does not) provide the integration of historical and inseason observations provided by this proposal. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | 12 month salary for database administrator and coordinator/web programmer. | $90,000 |
| Fringe | If this is a “value-added” service to entity with database admin, subtract 6-month salary ($26,000) | $21,000 |
| Supplies | $13,000 | |
| Capital | If this is “value-added” service using existing computer resources, subtract $40,000. | $40,000 |
| Subcontractor | Columbia Basin Research, University of Washington; Fish Passage Center; StreamNet [Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission] | $0 |
| $164,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $164,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $164,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: 4/1/1999 - All services of Objectives 1 and 3 to be functional to serve information during juvenile outmigration
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Comment:
Duplicates FPC and StreamNetComment:
This is an adequate proposal rated in the upper midrange of the set. The proposal does not clarify why the problems inherent in the primary databases are not fixed instead of adding a second tier (this proposal). There is little explanation of how the 2nd tier is done. The objectives are not the same in table and text. The work is not so much collaborative as competitive, but this is all laid out and stated in terms of the need to cooperate. This project seems to be the result of frustration with other projects not doing what was expected.REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $264,075 | $264,075 | $264,075 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website