FY 1999 proposal 199603301
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199603301 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Supplement and Enhance the Two Existing Stocks of Yakima R. Fall Chinook |
| Proposal ID | 199603301 |
| Organization | Yakama Indian Nation (YIN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Mel Sampson |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / yinfish@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
| Short description | --Test new supplementation techniques to increase natural production and improve harvest opportunities, while maintaining genetic fitness of salmonid populations; and, -- Provide critical knowledge to resource managers throughout the Columbia River Basin |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 8812001 | Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project MGMT. | Core Management/Admin. Support services for all YIN's YKFP Tasks. |
| 8811500 | Yakima Hatchery Construction | Final design/construction of needed acclimation facilities/wells for YFP. |
| 9701300 | Yakima Cle Elum Hatchery O&M | O&M costs for Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facilities. Core Facility for the Yakima Fisheries Project. |
| 9506300 | Yakima/Klickitat M&E Program | Covers the diverse M&E needs for the target species which are essential for the success of the YKFP. |
| 8812008 | Fisheries Technician Field Activities | Provides essential technical support to fulfill the diverse needs of the YKFP i.e. M&E support, surveys, juvenile facility operations, marking, etc. |
| 8812005 | Fish Passage Video Monitoring | Monitors, at Prosser and Roza dams,the adult salmonids returning to Yakima Basin. The need for this key M&E information is essential to YFP. |
| 9706200 | Objectives & Strategies for Yakima | Represents the modeling process, for iterative planning for species consistent with the Regional Assessment of Supplementation Project. |
| 9603302 | Yakima River Coho Restoration-O&M | Essential for YKFP's all stock initiative for experimental purposes for supplementation. |
| 9506404 | Policy/Tech Involvement/Planning-YKFP | Supports the required co-manager process for the YKFP |
| 9506406 | Monitoring of Supplementation Response Variables for YKFP | Essential for adequate M&E planning and technical participation as co-manager of the YKFP. |
| 9506402 | Upper Yakima Species Interaction Studies | Vital M&E function relative to behavior of multi species within the Yakima Basin for the YKFP. Defines competitive/ecological interaction |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $150,000 | |
| Fringe | 25.3% | $37,950 |
| Supplies | $75,000 | |
| Operating | $300,000 | |
| Capital | $170,000 | |
| Travel | $35,000 | |
| Indirect | 26.6% | $185,654 |
| Subcontractor | USFWS | $100,000 |
| $1,053,604 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,053,604 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,053,604 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Broodstock availability, construction, NEPA, PSR, budget constraints
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete: Reduce to approx. 10 pg. (submitted as 35 pg.), Relate Abstract and Description of Objectives (Sec. 7b.) to Sec. 4 (Objectives) and concentrate on describing this project specifically. Define methods for project tasks - i.e. What are critical stock identification techniques that will be employed (Objectives 1f, 2c, 4c), how will habitat inventory be done (Objective 2b), what new rearing and acclimation treatments will be tested and how (Objective 4b)?
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes
Comment:
Cost savings from increased efficienciesISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
YKFP Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposal gives little specifics on fall chinook. It needs to provide better technical detail specific to the project. It uses the same boilerplate language as some of the other YKFP projects.