FY 1999 proposal 199603501
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Satus Watershed Restoration |
| Proposal ID | 199603501 |
| Organization | Yakama Indian Nation (YIN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Lynn Hatcher, Fisheries Program Manager |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / lynn@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
| Short description | Reestablish landscape level ecological processes disrupted by modern land uses. We are restoring normative interactions between soil, water, and vegetation necessary for creation and maintenance of the aquatic habitat essential to anadromous fishes. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 926200 |
Lower Valley Wetlands and Riparian Area Restoration Project |
Lower-watershed complement to this project. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
Includes 4 professional staff (3 FTE’s), 10 technicians (8.75 FTE’s), 1 Bookkeeper (.25 FTE) |
$273,946 |
| Fringe |
25.3% |
$69,308 |
| Supplies |
office supplies, seed, herbicide, prescribed burning, erosion control, tools, etc. |
$29,410 |
| Operating |
portable office rent, utilities, vehicles, fuel, repairs, insurance |
$65,381 |
| Travel |
symposia, profesional presentations |
$4,000 |
| Indirect |
23.5% |
$112,247 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$11,000 |
| Other |
|
$24,600 |
| $589,892 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $589,892 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $589,892 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Weather is the major constraint on operations. Winter conditions can inhibit access over primitive roads or in stream channels. The length of the season for propagating vegetation is limited by duration of soil moisture.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Clearly describe how the objectives in FY99 differ from FY98.Technical Issue: Explain how the staffing level is not excessive to achieve the objectives.
Technical Issue: Too similar to the original FY98 proposal – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Slight reduction from increased efficiencies
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a well-written proposal--good balance of concepts and details. The proposal describes a well-planned project, with significant progress already. The watershed-scale conceptual foundation is excellent. It is well integrated with other projects. Minor criticisms include a failure to give details on the personnel. The technical background could be described better.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $388,600 |
$388,600 |
$388,600 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website