FY 1999 proposal 199604300

Additional documents

TitleType
199604300 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleJohnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement - O&M and M&E
Proposal ID199604300
OrganizationNez Perce Tribe (NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJohn S. Gebhards
Mailing addressP.O. Box 1942 McCall, ID 83638
Phone / email2086345290 / johng@nezperce.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Salmon
Short descriptionDevelop native chinook broodstock for rearing in Nature's concept production program & release of smolts to recover Johnson Creek summer chinook population, with utilization of on-site adult collection/holding & juvenile rearing/acclimation.
Target speciesSnake River summer chinook salmon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $270,000
Fringe $60,000
Supplies $100,000
Operating $150,000
Capital $450,000
Tag $52,200
Travel $63,000
Indirect $140,000
Subcontractor $14,800
$1,300,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$1,300,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$1,300,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Availability of salmon for supplementation in 1999 may change the focus of the project to a captive brood stock program instead of supplementation project. Completion of NEPA analysis and ESA requirements is expected in 1998, but could extend into 1999. Completion of NPPC 3-step review/approval process could cause delays in final design and construction of necessary facilities. Final design and construction should begin in 1998 and be completed in 1999 or 2000. However, the availability of qualified engineering design firms and construction firms could set design and construction time lines back into 2000 or 2001.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Clarify budget - Planning 120k, Interagency coord. 260k, Report 65k.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal is to build a new facility for collecting and raising new broodstock (a small-scale production initiative), but it does not give adequate justification of the need for this activity. The proposal does not adequately describe or justify the methods to be used, though it states that NATURE’s technology will be used and evaluated. Likely effectiveness of supplementation is not well addressed, though the five-generation supplementation timeframe is consistent with RASP guidelines.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$923,887 $923,887 $923,887

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website