FY 1999 proposal 199605300
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199605300 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | North Fork John Day River Dredge Tailings Restoration |
Proposal ID | 199605300 |
Organization | USDA Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (USFS, CTUIR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | John Sanchez |
Mailing address | Umatilla NF, 2517 SW Hailey Ave. Pendleton, OR 9780s1 |
Phone / email | 5412783819 / |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / John Day |
Short description | Restore floodplain function to dredge mined reaches of NFJD River tributaries by rehabilitating areas with cone-shaped tailings piles that restrict river flow. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
Not interdependent with other projects. (possibly ODFW project on private land) Call Jeff Neal at 541-575-0561 |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Operating | $27,000 | |
Subcontractor | $58,000 | |
$85,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $85,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $85,000 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Technical Issue: Provide a monitoring plan.Comment:
Decrease due to lack of agreement on the "bog" taskISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This appears to be a good idea, but the proposal does not justify the project. This is the most important spawning habitat in the North Fork of the John Day, but this fact is not described in the proposal. The proposal needs to reference other related projects.