FY 1999 proposal 199607000
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199607000 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | McKenzie River Focus Watershed Coordination |
| Proposal ID | 199607000 |
| Organization | McKenzie Watershed Council |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | John Runyon |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 1025 Corvallis, OR 97339 |
| Phone / email | 5417580947 / runyon@proaxis.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
| Short description | Continue administration of McKenzie Focus Watershed for coordinated planning, assessment, monitoring, and fish and wildlife enhancement projects |
| Target species | Upper Willamette spring chinook, bull trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $60,000 | |
| Fringe | $12,216 | |
| Supplies | $8,225 | |
| Operating | $9,920 | |
| Travel | $6,000 | |
| Subcontractor | $0 | |
| Other | $8,639 | |
| $105,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $105,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $105,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Inadequate funding of continuing progams may cause schedule delays
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Good example of a coordinator proposal.
Comment:
Comment:
ISRP review notes that the McKenzie River watershed has experienced extensive growth and development, with the result that coordination is urgently required for riverine protection and enhancement. The proposal is stated quite reasonably, with built-in monitoring and evaluation. It is commended for its analytical approach. The matrix demonstrates awareness of the need for a comprehensive methodology as well.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $127,133 | $127,133 | $127,133 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website