FY 1999 proposal 199608300

Additional documents

TitleType
199608300 Narrative Narrative
199608300 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleUpper Grande Ronde Habitat Enhancement
Proposal ID199608300
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameAllen Childs
Mailing addressP.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97850
Phone / email5412785267 / wildlife@ucinet.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short descriptionContinue with the McCoy Meadows Meadow Restoration Project located on a private ranch in the McCoy and Meadow Creek subwatersheds and the multi-year project devoped by CTUIR, ODFW, NRCS, USFS and landowners along the Grande Ronde River.
Target speciesSnake River Spring chinook salmon and summer steelhead trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $36,995
Fringe $10,729
Supplies $51,700
Operating $4,700
Travel $4,082
Indirect $36,794
Subcontractor $55,000
$200,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$200,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$200,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Explain how this project is differentiated from FY98 work.

Technical Issue: Resubmit the proposal with specific projects for 99 based on approved 98 funding.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Was 9128
Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

(previously 9128) The original proposal is not clear. Technical justification is inadequate and objectives and planned activities are vague. The description of monitoring is inadequate, and the proposal lacks criteria with which to measure the project’s success. The revised proposal did a better job detailing the location of the project but otherwise did not improve significantly from the original.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$190,000 $190,000 $190,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website