FY 1999 proposal 199608600
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Clearwater Subbasin Focus Watershed Program |
| Proposal ID | 199608600 |
| Organization | Idaho Soil Conservation Commission (ISCC) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Janet Hohle |
| Mailing address | 220 E 5th St. Moscow, ID 83843 |
| Phone / email | 2088820507 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Clearwater |
| Short description | Develop and implement a comprehensive system to coordinate multip jurisdictions, agencies and private landowners in their effort to protect, restore, enhance anadromous fisheries habitat. |
| Target species | Anadromous and Resident Fish |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$38,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$12,920 |
| Supplies |
|
$11,000 |
| Capital |
|
$5,000 |
| Travel |
|
$6,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$7,292 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| Other |
|
$5,000 |
| $85,212 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $85,212 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $85,212 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: The Clearwater River subbasin habitat assessment is largely dependent upon work being performed by the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Nez Perce Tribe, and Idaho Department of Fish and Game to establish existing conditions and an environmental baseline for spring chinook salmon, steelhead trout, bull trout, and westslope cutthroat trout. The habitat assessment will become the framework for long-term work in the Clearwater subbasin; proposal development for projects in the near-term will be substantially based on previous planning prioritizations.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Management Issue: Resubmit single proposal with two co-coordinator positions listed (even understanding that there is a difficult coordination situation at hand) – combine project 9608600 with 9700600.Technical Issue: Basically, the same proposal as the FY98 proposal – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding, and progress towards consolidating the project with the other co-coordinator.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Inadequate after revisions
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The revised proposals include clearer objectives than the original, but the proposals remain carelessly written and not clearly justified. There is little description of implementation of restoration activities. These proposals list many partners. Can the partners do the analytical phase of scoping the problem without BPA funding?
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $103,626 |
$103,626 |
$103,626 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website