FY 1999 proposal 199608600

Additional documents

TitleType
199608600 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleClearwater Subbasin Focus Watershed Program
Proposal ID199608600
OrganizationIdaho Soil Conservation Commission (ISCC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJanet Hohle
Mailing address220 E 5th St. Moscow, ID 83843
Phone / email2088820507 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Clearwater
Short descriptionDevelop and implement a comprehensive system to coordinate multip jurisdictions, agencies and private landowners in their effort to protect, restore, enhance anadromous fisheries habitat.
Target speciesAnadromous and Resident Fish
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $38,000
Fringe $12,920
Supplies $11,000
Capital $5,000
Travel $6,000
Indirect $7,292
Subcontractor $0
Other $5,000
$85,212
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$85,212
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$85,212
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: The Clearwater River subbasin habitat assessment is largely dependent upon work being performed by the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Nez Perce Tribe, and Idaho Department of Fish and Game to establish existing conditions and an environmental baseline for spring chinook salmon, steelhead trout, bull trout, and westslope cutthroat trout. The habitat assessment will become the framework for long-term work in the Clearwater subbasin; proposal development for projects in the near-term will be substantially based on previous planning prioritizations.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Resubmit single proposal with two co-coordinator positions listed (even understanding that there is a difficult coordination situation at hand) – combine project 9608600 with 9700600.

Technical Issue: Basically, the same proposal as the FY98 proposal – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding, and progress towards consolidating the project with the other co-coordinator.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Inadequate after revisions
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

The revised proposals include clearer objectives than the original, but the proposals remain carelessly written and not clearly justified. There is little description of implementation of restoration activities. These proposals list many partners. Can the partners do the analytical phase of scoping the problem without BPA funding?
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$103,626 $103,626 $103,626

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website