FY 1999 proposal 199702500

Additional documents

TitleType
199702500 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleImplement the Wallowa County/Nez Perce Tribe Salmon Recovery Plan
Proposal ID199702500
OrganizationNez Perce Tribe (NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDon Bryson
Mailing address201 W. North St., Rm 113 Enterprise, OR 97828
Phone / email5414260119 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short descriptionMaintenance and/or restoration of salmon habitat through cooperative and voluntary methods is a stated goal in the Wallowa County/Nez Perce Tribe Salmon Recovery Plan . The Plan documents habitat problems in Wallowa County and suggests solutions.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Supplies $4,000
Indirect $2,500
Subcontractor $10,000
Other $33,500
$50,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$50,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$50,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: 1. The Tribe’s priorities may change. 2. NEPA, NMFS/USF&W consultation, and fill and removal permit applications may take longer than anticipated. 3. Project opportunities may occur which were not anticipated. 4. Land owner availability for projects may change. 5. Unforseen issues (eg. having to fill out two sets of questionnaires like this one plus a mid-year set of questions for FY98 BPA funding).


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Explain how this project differs from the Grande Ronde Model Watershed implementation project 9402700 and projects 9403900 and 9202601.

Technical Issue: Clearly explain how the money will be spent. Organize the budget by Task. Explain what will be purchased with funds in the "Other" category.

Management Issue: The proposed project should be combined with project 9402700 (Grande Ronde Model Watershed).

Management Issue: Supplemental information discussed why these are separate projects, but the general system trend is to unify watersheds. This raises a broader question - how do large watersheds coordinate?

Management Issue: The project proponents are encouraged to work through the watershed board.

Technical Issue: Explain the specific M&E plans.

Technical Issue: Resubmit for 99 work based on approved 98 funding.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Slight reduction from increased efficiencies
Recommendation:
Adequate after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

9403900 is a proposal for a tribal liaison. It should be joined with 9702500, which describes the activities to be done by the liaison. The original proposals did not describe objectives, methods, or technical justification for activities. The revised proposal provides sufficient technical justification and more detail overall on the need for planning and coordination, but it does not clearly explain methods. The project needs to have clear criteria by which success of activities will be evaluated.