FY 1999 proposal 199705100
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Yakima Basin Side Channels |
| Proposal ID | 199705100 |
| Organization | Yakama Indian Nation (YIN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Scott Nicolai |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / snicolai@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
| Short description | Protect, restore and reestablish access to productive off-channel rearing habitats, and protect and reconnect floodplains associated with the mainstem Yakima and Naches Rivers. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$38,940 |
| Fringe |
|
$23,964 |
| Supplies |
|
$25,767 |
| Operating |
|
$42,600 |
| Capital |
|
$489,293 |
| Travel |
|
$3,336 |
| Indirect |
|
$226,100 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$150,000 |
| $1,000,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,000,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,000,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Broken out by each objective, the potential time constraints are as follows:
Objective #1: Protect at-risk rearing habitats and floodplain areas through conservation easement purchase and property acquisition.
Time constraints include land availability, potential limitations of conservation easement recipients, weather limitations on land appraisals, contractor scheduling (for fence construction).
Objective #2: Restore connectivity to off-channel rearing habitats and floodplains.
Time constraints include construction season limitations, contractor schedules permitting delays, permit limitations, and coordinating with private landowners.
Objective #3: Restore habitat function in off-channel habitats.
Time constraints include construction season limitations, contractor schedules permitting delays, permit limitations, and coordinating with private landowners.
Objective #4: Monitor and report results of project activities.
Time constraints include weather limitations.
Major milestones include:
1. Inventory subbasin within key reaches to prioritize protection, restoration and reconnection projects.
2. Establish contact with private landowners and affected companies.
3. Develop MOU’s with interested parties.
4. Implement habitat protection/restoration/reconnection efforts.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Explain what basis will be used to determine which specific sites will be chosen (similar to land and water easement proposals). Need to identify the specific properties.Technical Issue: Expand the project history information.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposed activity is likely to be beneficial to fish and wildlife. The monitoring and technical background need to be better described. The methodology lacks specific details.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $0 |
$1,728,704 |
$1,728,704 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website