FY 1999 proposal 199705600

Additional documents

TitleType
199705600 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleLower Klickitat River Riparian & In-Channel Habitat Enhancement Project
Proposal ID199705600
OrganizationYakama Indian Nation Fisheries Program (YIN)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameMel Sampson
Mailing addressP.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948
Phone / email5098656262 / yinfish@yakama.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Klickitat
Short descriptionImprove habitat and riparian conditions for steelhead, coho with cattle exclosure fencing, land aquistions, large woody debris, enhance pool formation, capture spawning gravels, revegetation of riparian areas, augment summer flows, reduce sediment.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9506800 Klickitat Passage/Habitat Preliminary Design Baseline data collection through project 9506800 can used to more effectively direct watershed project in the Klickitat basin.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel 1/2 Bookkeeper, 1/12 YIN Biologist, 1/4 WDFW biologist no cost. additional cost share NRCS USFWS $11,000
Fringe 15.3 % $1,683
Supplies Fencing supplies, tools, rooted stock, cuttings, in-channel structures $70,000
Operating Materials and analysis TFW habitat monitoring for project $7,000
Capital Land acquisition, off-channel livestock watering $95,000
Tag none $0
Travel none $0
Indirect 23.6% $40,000
Subcontractor Northwest Service Academy (NWSA); Cahill's Well Drilling; Land Appraisal; Archaeological Survey $71,000
$295,683
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$295,683
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$295,683
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: None are anticipated


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision*
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Clearly describe how the proposed action addresses the critical limiting factor, the assessment that identified those factors as being limiting, specifically what the measurable objectives are, and how the results will be monitored to determine if they are as expected.

Technical Issue: Need site-specific information (miles of fencing, etc.)

Technical Issue: Clarify specifically what is being proposed and what the expected results are.

Technical Issue: Need to clearly describe how the techniques are valid and appropriate to achieve the objectives, and the specific fish and wildlife benefit.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a well-written proposal, but it should provide more specifics regarding methods and better technical justification. The proposal does not provide enough information to ensure that they will arrive at a technically justifiable baseline. Photo-monitoring would be useful, but vegetative surveys should be used to document project success.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$397,414 $397,414 $397,414

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website